Native
Americans, as the first people to inhabit the Northern American continent, have
influenced the lives of all twenty-first century Americans in innumerable ways,
but no tradition has remained so prevalent in our society as the farming of
corn. While this crop was invaluable to Native Americans, our contemporary
culture has fetishized corn and exploited it to excess. With the destruction of
Native American values, especially those rooted in animism and a correlating
sense of respect for the environment, modern American practices regarding the
cultivation and consumption of corn have proved detrimental to the health of
our people and our land.
Almost every
decision a person makes today, ranging from political beliefs to personal
health, can now be linked back to the advent of corn – whether or not this fact
has a predominantly positive or negative affect on American citizens is
debatable, but it is undeniable that corn has played an integral part in the
creation of the United States as we know it today.
While
the major corporations of the twenty-first century are not as resourceful with
the entire plant as America’s aboriginals, they’ve discovered infinitely more uses
for the corn itself. In fact, it’s been reported that “of the 45,000-odd items in American
supermarkets, more than one quarter contain corn”; these products include “disposable
diapers, trash bags, toothpaste, charcoal briquettes, matches, batteries, and
even the shine on the covers of magazines.” It may be surprising to read the
tags on some such items and discover they contain traces of corn, but it’s even
more disconcerting to discover that certain food items are more corn than they
are what they claim to be.
As Michael Pollan,
a journalist who has extensively researched modern industrial food practices, stated,
“If you are what you eat, and especially if you eat industrial food, as 99
percent of Americans do, what you are is ‘corn’.” Though America (as the nation
that was born only a few hundred years ago) lacks much of a culinary identity
beyond the simple, mostly packaged products eaten at annual celebrations of its
Fourth of July founding, the cornstalk has become somewhat of a symbol of the
country’s food heritage. Americans tend to think we eat a diverse range of internationally
inspired meals, but our dishes aren’t much different than what we force-feed
our livestock. As journalist Tim Flannery claimed, “all meat is also ultimately corn.” Animals that would be
“far healthier and happier eating grass” such as chickens, turkeys, pigs, cows
and even salmon now consume kernels daily. The Native Americans who pioneered the
use of corn probably wouldn’t immediately recognize the variety that we eat
today. Farmers originally grew strains of maize that produced tough,
multi-colored kernels, which have been replaced by homogenous, yellow products
that seem to come more from a lab than a field.
The
innovations made to corn plants and the way it is farmed has had a large influence
on American politics and it’s no wonder the issue has been brought right to our
doorstep – as “the biggest legal cash crop” in the United States, corns
blankets “eighty million acres – an area twice the size of New York State… like
a second great American lawn.” Based on ever-increasing population growth, this
isn’t hard to believe. The small-scale farming that fed Native American tribes
could not support the vast number of people living on the North American
continent today, nor would it allow our country to export such a large quantity
of this high-demand commodity; however, this doesn’t mean we should abandon all
traditional farming techniques.
Pesticides and
machines maintain the cornfields that cover the United States today; the plants
themselves grow from seeds that were modified in laboratories to be sweeter and
more durable. Beyond the consequences of spraying harmful chemicals on our food
and allowing dangerous run-off into the water of local ecosystems, our nation’s
hunger for corn has also had serious repercussions for the health of our
country’s soil. However, concern for the environment has been prioritized below
a focus on our economy by the federal government. Billions of dollars are paidto growers of commodity crops, such as corn, each year as a part of the Food,
Conservation and Energy Act (commonly referred to as the “farm bill”), which
was part of a federal support campaign for agriculture that began during the
Great Depression. These subsidies lower the price of products made with corn,
subsequently making a diet high in starches more affordable for low-income
households. Though debates about American obesity are prominently heard in the
public discourse, it’s imperative that we link the issue back to its source:
corn.
North
America has had a long history with corn and it won’t be ending any time soon.
Thank you for informing people about this issue. Maybe it would be useful to look at some of the reasons why these subsidies exist. Firstly basically every country subsidizes farmers because they are one of the most powerful lobbies. In America any party that would shoot down these subsidies would risk losing critical votes in the corn states like Kansas. Secondly ethanol subsidies loom large because people either mistakenly believe that ethanol is a "green" energy or they mistakenly believe that a policy of energy independence is worth pursuing. Thirdly American policy makers of the Cold War era wanted to subsidize food in international trade to subsidize the modernization of poor allies to avoid communist insurrections.
ReplyDeleteThat’s an amazing post.
ReplyDeleteI’ve read Michael Pollan’s book The Omnivore’s Dilemma and was horrified to find out how much corn is in our food and how cruelly we force-feed cows with excess corn we end up with. Very nicely mentioned and explained by previous commentator Peterson Walrod about correlation between enormous amounts of corn that is produced by mid-western farmers, is created by government’s subsidies to win over farmer’s votes. Now it all goes back to us and those farmers that eat corn contaminated food and suffer from obesity. We don’t gain anything from over producing corn; neither do those farmers that acquire short-term gains. Politians though win here a lot, they so-call produce jobs, make people happy and receive millions of votes. Further on they create an over-weighted, sick society that is even more dependent on this government. And here our government one more time graciously appears with a hand generously full with food stamps and unemployment. Doesn’t it look like a horrifyingly dangerous circle of events that slowly but thoroughly destroy our society?
I thought this was a really interesting post. It's very sad to me that politicians and profits dictate the health and well-being of our society. A report just came out saying that despite what has been reported, childhood obesity rates are not staying static or declining, they are still going up. Our nation's reliance on processed foods and on fillers that are less expensive (corn) is what's helping cause this epidemic to continue to grow. My question then becomes: when will this ever stop? Politicians are constantly fishing for votes and business owners are constantly fishing for profits, so it seems there will never be a chance for the American citizen to be considered first.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI never realized that our corn was more lab-made than field-grown! That is rather horrifying, in my opinion. I enjoyed reading this post, particularly because American obsession with corn...and my own obsession with corn for that matter...is something I have never paid much attention to.
ReplyDeleteI think your statement about corn allowing low-income Americans to fill their meals with the starchy stuff at a cheap price is a huge issue. Corn has always been a large part of my eating, and I never even took the time to consider that it is fattening. I do not recall ever having been educated on this matter before now. Somehow, Americans (like myself) should be more aware of what they are putting into their bodies. I feel like diet is not talked about enough in our society or in our education systems, and it should be.
Your post takes issue specifically with Corn, but I feel like a lot of the things you have to say here could be said about industrial agriculture in general. You figure, California's soil is quickly approaching a point when it won't be usable without some serious (serious serious serious) fertilization.
ReplyDeleteMy question to you, what would it take for you to give a thumbs up to how Corn, and industrial agriculture in general, function in our world. The way I see it, our civilization cannot presently sustain itself on truly sustainable tactics, meaning that whatever agriculture we end up doing anyway is going to being terribly for the world anyway.
As much as I'm opposed to seed patents and farming monopolies, I'm not actually all that opposed to the artificial modification of what we eat. If we can engineer a better corn cob, then realistically why shouldn't we? I understand the risks of plague and a reduction of genetic diversity, but crop plagues happen regardless anyway.